We concluded that, in the circumstances, CIE made appropriate grading decisions. Is this page useful? For example on Paper 3 there were 10 marks between the boundary marks for A and C and on the coursework component there were 12 marks between A and C. As is normal practice, we have already turned our attention to the summer grading. CIE concluded that the grading was carried out appropriately, although they anticipate making some further refinements to their awarding this summer, as is standard practice for exam boards. A site to help anyone submit a Freedom of Information request.
Are you the owner of any commercial copyright on this page? Looking for an EU Authority? Published 15 April The information contained in this email may be subject to public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act and unless legally exempt from disclosure, the confidentiality of this email and your reply cannot be guaranteed. This supports similar analyses conducted by Cambridge Assessment.
CIE IGCSE English Language Past Papers – Revision World
CIE told us that they intended to tighten their grade standards at C and, to a lesser extent, at A. In response courseworo those coursewkrk, in October Ofqual reviewed the available technical evidence provided by CIE in July. As is normal practice, we have already turned our attention to the summer grading. The request was successful.
Ultimately I’d like to know how close I might have been. Innearlystudents tookcompared to 17, taking Explore the topic Key stage 3 and 4 exam marking, qualifications and results Exam regulation and administration.
CIE IGCSE® First Language English: Summer 2015
Please tell us what format you need. Help us protect your right to hold public authorities to account. Maybe Yes this page is useful No this page is not useful Is there anything wrong with this page? Awarding is more difficult when cohorts change significantly. CIE concluded that the grading was carried out appropriately, although they anticipate making some further refinements to their awarding this summer, as is standard practice for exam boards.
The award was more severe and so more in line with GCSE standards than inbut there was no evidence to suggest that CIE had tightened the award beyond what was intended and beyond the usual adjustments that exam boards routinely make on the basis of post-award evidence.
Donate and support our work. There was also a substantial overseas entry for For summerCIE proposed to tighten their grade standards. While we recognised that the narrow grade widths in Paper 2 were far from ideal, we found that CIE made appropriate awarding decisions and did not find that the award was unsafe.
UK entries for are far higher than for because only is approved by the Department for Education for use in maintained schools. Sign in or sign up. In November approximately 40, UK students enteredmost of whom achieved a D in summer Published 15 April During the grading period, CIE provided us with copies of the evidence they were using, and we held several meetings with them via telephone during July.
Paper 2 marks are added to those of either Paper 3 or 4 according to the papers the student has taken to determine the overall grade. Again, we were content that their grading decisions were appropriate.
Write to your politician. At the same time, CIE issued very detailed explanations to HMC and to other stakeholders, which included their initial analysis of the summer outcomes.
Contact us if you think it ought be re-opened. Find out more about cookies or hide this message. Your donations keep this site and others like it running Donate now.
Igcse english coursework mark scheme – Google Docs
Looking for an EU Authority? Ofqual monitored the awarding of the elements of this specification in summer and reviewed the awards in autumn in the light of concerns expressed by some schools. Following the issue of results, concerns were expressed by schools that were unhappy with their results.